All Americans deserve better. No one cares about me.
What about the American oligarchs, I wondered, people like businessman Richard Uihlein, who regularly distort U.
If you are like most U. He lives in a mansion in Lake Forest, a hyper-opulent preserve north of Chicago. A longtime supporter of right-wing Wisconsin Gov.
Scott Walker, Uihlein is a major sponsor of hard-right Republican candidates—at both the state and federal levels—and organizations across the nation. So far, Uihlein is the top political contributor in the federal U. These megadonors are the superrich cream atop a deep plutocratic pitcher.
How are such ridiculously astronomical political investments—far beyond the capacity of all but a super-opulent minority of U.
The primary purpose of these groups cannot technically be political, but they can spend substantial amounts on political activities, such as TV commercials. It gave corporations and unions the green light to spend unlimited sums on ads and other political tools calling for the election or defeat of individual candidates.
While super PACS must disclose their donors, c 4 s are not required to do so. These nondisclosing organizations engage in numerous political activities: And that was just federal data.
It does not include campaign finance at the state level, where Problems with super pacs essay right-wing billionaire Koch brothers focus a lot of their legendary election funding and policymaking power.
Donald Trump and the Presidential Election. He dutifully complied with her corrupt victory and campaigned on her behalf as he promised from the start.
The Wall Street establishment kept its command over the not-so-leftmost side of the American two-party system. Things were different on the Republican side. His raucous rallies were laced with dripping denunciations of Wall Street, Goldman Sachs and globalization; mockery of George W.
He would become the first Republican presidential nominee in memory to outperform his Democratic opponent with small middle-class and working-class donors. Things were different after Trump won the Republican nomination, however.
He could no longer go it alone after the primaries.
It failed to set foot in Wisconsin after the Democratic convention or to purchase campaign ads in Michigan. Above all, the Clinton team decided not to talk about policy.
In an epic miscalculation, her team decided not to advance anything close to a standard, progressive-sounding, Democratic Party policy agenda. Clinton ran almost completely on the issue of candidate character and quality. Any campaign needs a reasonably strong policy platform to stand on in case of candidate difficulties.
What was her deafening policy silence about? This was a curse. The campaign sought to capitalize on the angst within business by vigorously courting the doubtful and undecideds there, not in the electorate. The impacts of both items 1 and 2 were infinitesimal in comparison with the role that big campaign money played both in silencing Clinton and funding Trump.
The blame-the-deplorable-racist-white-working-class narrative is belied by basic underlying continuities in white, working-class voting patterns. Imagine if Sanders had snuck past Clinton in the primary race.
Could he have defeated the billionaire and right-wing billionaire-backed Trump in the general election? Campaign finance is just the tip of the iceberg in how the American capitalist ruling class owns and runs the political and policy systems the United States.
Meanwhile, though, political money matters a great deal as we race into the midterm contests and the elections with U. This is the world we cover. Because of people like you, another world is possible.
There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We want the world to be a better place. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do.The crowd is challenging traditional leadership.
Here’s how to harness its energy. Sullum, a libertarian journalist, was the only panelist not affiliated with a super PAC, although Potter and Soros’s PACs have at least a hint of irony to their missions: Soros runs an anti.
Oct 17, · August 8, “If you’re a working journalist and you believe that Donald J. Trump is a demagogue playing to the nation’s worst racist and nationalistic tendencies, that he cozies up to anti-American dictators and that he would be dangerous with control of the United States nuclear codes, how the heck are you supposed to cover him?
A super PAC is a modern breed of a political-action committee that's allowed to raise and spend unlimited amounts of money from corporations, unions, individuals, and associations to influence the outcome of state and federal elections. To address these issues and solve deep problems, a Third American Revolution will be needed.
Below is an essay on "Super Pacs" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples. Super PACs, “play the political equivalent of a free safety, roving through states looking for someone to hit.” (Wilson, Reid) This quote sums up a super PACs .