Civil war compramises

Overview Union flag In the presidential electionRepublicansled by Abraham Lincolnsupported banning slavery in all the U. The Southern states viewed this as a violation of their constitutional rights and as the first step in a grander Republican plan to eventually abolish slavery. Republican Lincoln's votes centered in the north, Democrat Stephen A. Douglas ' votes were distributed nationally and Constitutional Unionist John Bell 's votes centered in TennesseeKentuckyand Virginia.

As with any war, you can analyze the causes of the Civil War for years on end and still not come up with a concrete conclusion as to what really sparked the fire. Most likely the separation of the union began decades before, as the North and South began to develop distinctly different economies, ideas, and personal beliefs.

I absolutely believe that the Compromise ofwhich occurred eleven years prior to the start of the Civil War, led to the break up of the Union in I have found that the documents I studied do not Civil war compramises support me in my belief, but give my position more grounds than I had previously believed to exist.

What was the Compromise of ?

The Connection

First of all, it is critical for me to illustrate what the Compromise of actually was. The compromise was introduced by Henry Clay to calm tensions between the North and South, and unify them more than ever before.

It ended up doing quite the opposite. In the compromise the North was promised California as a free state and a banning of the slave trade in Washington DC you could still own slaves. In the end, it also bought the North time to build up resources before the Civil War.

A map of how the states were divided up from the compromise North vs South It is important to note that differing opinions on slavery were not the only things that separated the North from the South. A strong sense of sectionalism, which had started brewing decades before, was coming a peak.

At that times murmurs of succession were spreading across the states, and people were ready to take action. In addition to sectionalism, strong opinions on slavery were forming as well. Issues with the Compromise The issue of returning slaves, and Personal Liberty Laws for slaves, was as much of a religious issue as it was a political one.

One of the main reasons that the Compromise of ended up being so biased to the North was because the Personal Liberty Laws were developed, and the Bloodhound Bill was not enforced. This goes to show that the divisions between the North and South were not only due to political policies, they were additionally due to differing religious interpretations.

A sign warning fugitive slaves In Conclusion In conclusion, I absolutely believe that the Compromise of was a major cause of the break up of the Union in The compromise greatly increased sectionalism, and strengthened the arguments of both the North and South against the other.

It also led to a separation in religious interpretations of the regions, and obviously beliefs about slavery on a morality standpoint. Looking back at how the compromise eventually worked out, it seems to me that it was inevitable that there would be great conflict.

Crittenden Compromise

The lesson I have received by studying the compromise is simple:Oct 31,  · Civil War Historians Beg to Differ Image John F. Kelly’s comments praising General Robert E. Lee and saying a lack of compromise led to the . Dec 02,  · Watch video · In December , on the eve of the Civil War, Kentucky Senator John J.

Crittenden () introduced legislation aimed at resolving the looming secession crisis in the Deep South. The. Oct 31,  · The morality of the compromise was and remains legitimately open to question.

But without it, there would likely have been no Union to defend in the Civil War. The Compromise of set up an untenable status quo between the northern and southern regions of the United States in terms of slavery policy.

The U.S. Congress intended to achieve a sustainable solution for the conflict over slavery policy. However, the Compromise of merely delayed the. Dec 23,  · An article on how the Compromise of caused the breakup of the union, and eventually the Civil War.

It also includes the effects the compromise had on slavery and new initiativeblog.coms: 6. The Compromise of When five individual bills were passed by the United States Congress in , the act was titled The Compromise of This compromise helped to defuse a four-year political debate between free states and slave states over the territories acquired during the to Mexican-American War.